chrispeng [ad_1]
What is the closer relationship between item-level IDs, supply chain security, inventory accuracy, asset management, or financial responsibility? Answer: It is closely related to all of the above.
Let’s study these activities in more detail and understand the different benefits of item-level labeling in the United States.
retail
On the “Big Show” of the American Retail Federation in January 2011, an item-level RFID initiative conference attracted more than 100 attendees, from retailers to suppliers, to technology providers to researchers. According to reports, the conclusion of the conference is that by the end of 2012, item-level RFID labeling may be quite common in apparel and footwear retail.
Of course, labeling is only a small part of item-level identification. A series of management policies must also be established, such as the management of sellers using multiple suppliers, the management of whether the batch information of commodities (such as food and beverage) is sufficient, how to share and use the collected data, and when and where to read Labeling and management of comprehensive traceability and accountability processes. Of course, there is also the acquisition of equipment and the implementation of systems throughout the supply chain, including transportation.
Therefore, it is one thing that RFID labeling may be very common by the end of 2012. But by then RFID technology will be widely used is another matter.
However, we can clearly know from this conference that item-level recognition in retail can provide huge benefits for inventory management, inventory reduction and prevention of shrinkage.
Food/Pharmaceuticals
On February 14-15, 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) held a public seminar to discuss the decision to adopt a tracking and tracing prescription drug system.
The focus of the FDA seminar was to discuss the basic principles of the traceability system. Labeling is relatively easy, reading is relatively easy, and it is difficult to develop a system to use these data.
Of course, “easy” is also relative. It is feasible to embed RFID tags in paper labels and encode them, and several companies have implemented them.
However, deciding how to manage all this data, who can access the data, where the data is stored, and all other details of the system is not so simple.
US Department of Defense (DoD)
The importance of item-level labeling is also reflected in the US Department of Defense. Obviously, the Ministry of Defense has a huge inventory, including some very common items, such as furniture and trucks, as well as some very sensitive items, such as weapons and aircraft parts. All of these items need to be uniquely identified, tracked and explained in order to perform asset management, maintenance, and financial accounting.
In the U.S. Department of Defense, the identification of leftover items will involve some issues: cost, complexity (if this item needs to be removed from the service object, is it unified with the maintenance plan), evaluation of the content that needs to be labeled, and the life of the item Whether the cycle is long enough to be worth labeling, and whether the data is available on the remaining items. If the characteristics of an item (date of acquisition, supplier, etc.) are not known, then simply identifying an item is of no benefit.
in conclusion
Just like the early use of barcodes, different companies want to achieve different goals, but in the end they all come to the same conclusion. Item-level ID can provide safety and security for the supply chain, provide better asset management, better financial records and inventory control. Of course, various issues in the labeling process must be carefully considered.
Compilation feeling: The benefits of item-level RFID labeling have been proved to be obvious through practice. In recent years, developed countries such as Europe and the United States have been keen to take the route of item-level RFID labeling, which proves the high return on investment of RFID and their desire to expand the RFID market. The focus of the application. But behind the item-level RFID labeling, there are still a series of technologies, analysis, procedures, management and other tasks that need to be done, which are linked together. Once there are omissions or under-consideration links, the benefits of RFID will go to the opposite side. At present, my country’s item-level RFID labeling has not been widely deployed, but is only a small-scale pilot in the retail, logistics, food, pharmaceutical and other fields, and it is mainly waiting for the tipping point of technology and cost. In addition, standards and safety are also obstacles in the face of item-level RFID labeling. In terms of cost, although the prices of RFID tags and readers have been declining year by year, under the pressure of rising prices, the cost of using RFID is still slightly lower than that of barcodes. In terms of standards, not only the issue of standards for different frequencies, but also coding standards, etc., some details of standard formulation still need to be improved. In terms of security, including the security of data collection, the security of tag tamper-proofing, the security of user privacy, etc., are all issues that need to be resolved urgently. In addition, when talking about the Internet of Things, the perception mentioned in it is not the pursuit of all things in the world, as large as every building and every set of equipment, as small as every cup and every grain of sand. It is targeted and effective. Labeling. The author believes that only by recognizing the effectiveness of labeling and overcoming all the difficulties in the labeling process, the application of item-level RFID and even the entire RFID can move forward.
[ad_2]
